WORKSPACES / HUGGING FACE / PROJECT #20
STATIC SPACEv1.0
DECISION SCIENCE PLATFORM / EXPERIMENT LIFECYCLE

From experiments
to evidence.

Design better tests. Quantify uncertainty. Make defensible decisions.

ⓘ
Demonstration environment. All five preloaded experiments are synthetic. Statistical results are computed from the entered counts, but are not observations from real people or systems. This tool is not a causal-identification engine and does not replace research design or scientific review.
EVIDENCE PORTFOLIO

Experiment outcomes

Descriptive categories
CROSS-PROJECT VIEW

Estimated treatment lifts

Relative %, unadjusted
DECISION REVIEW

Portfolio signals

01 / DEFINESpecify the metric

Write the hypothesis and agree on an exposure unit.

02 / DESIGNPlan sample size

Choose a detectable effect, alpha and statistical power.

03 / MONITORCheck data quality

Review allocation balance and expected event counts.

04 / DECIDEAssess uncertainty

Interpret effect size, confidence interval and limitations.

ACTIVE REGISTER

Experiment portfolio

EXPERIMENTSECTOREXPOSURESRELATIVE LIFTTWO-SIDED PINDICATION

A statistically detected difference does not establish causality without valid assignment, measurement, and protocol integrity.

Statistical analysis

Compare two independent conversion proportions. Calculations update from stored experiment counts, not fabricated model predictions.

RATE COMPARISON

Observed conversion rates

EFFECT ESTIMATE

Absolute treatment difference

METHOD GUARDRAILS

Diagnostic checks

BUSINESS TRANSLATION

Illustrative unit economics

Sample-size planner

Approximate the sample size needed per arm for a two-sided independent-proportions z test, assuming equal allocation, fixed design and the specified uplift.

BEFORE YOU LAUNCH

Design parameters

RECOMMENDED DESIGN / APPROXIMATE
Do not repeatedly peek at interim p-values and stop when significant without a pre-specified sequential-testing procedure. Formula assumes independent observations.

Scenario simulator

Explore the sampling variability implied by the observed rates. The simulation uses a seeded normal approximation, not real-world future events or a Bayesian posterior.

SAMPLING VARIABILITY

Simulated treatment effects

Frequency distribution, absolute percentage points

These simulated differences reflect estimated variance under a simplified model. The proportion above zero is not the probability that the treatment truly works.

Reports & data

Export your projects for reproducibility and transparent review. Saved work stays in this browser unless explicitly exported.

EXPORTS

Download evidence

Keep analysis results, experiment definitions, warnings and the export timestamp. Report conclusions are explicitly conditional.

IMPORT / RESET

Restore a workspace

JSON imports replace current experiments after confirmation. Existing work is never deleted automatically.

EXPLICIT LIMITATIONS

Interpret with care

What this provides

Independent two-proportion z test, Newcombe-Wilson confidence intervals, allocation checks, power approximation, seeded resampling approximation, and exportable documentation.

What it does not establish

Randomization quality, absence of contamination, treatment compliance, unbiased outcomes, external validity, multiple-test adjustment, or a causal effect by itself.

Quality before significance

Pre-register a primary metric and stopping rule, validate instrumentation, examine guardrails, and investigate sample-ratio mismatch before deciding.

EXPERIMENT RECORD

Create experiment

CONTROL / A
TREATMENT / B